[A-DX] {dxld} VOA Radiogram, 11-12 Mar 2017
RogerSa Mär 18 13:37:13 CET 2017
- Vorherige Nachricht (dieses Gesprächs): [A-DX] {dxld} VOA Radiogram, 11-12 Mar 2017
- Nächste Nachricht (dieses Gesprächs): [A-DX] Rum
- Nachrichten sortiert nach: [ Datum ] [ Thema ] [ Betreff (Subject) ] [ Autor ]
Am 11.03.2017 um 00:20 schrieb [dxld]: > Includes a comparison of two 58-wpm modes, MFSK16 and Olivia 8-1000 ... > > http://voaradiogram.net/post/158241085387/voa-radiogram-11-12-march-2017-battle-of-the > Stress test: MFSK16 versus OL-8-1K in a Wave Editor 1.) as a mix, in one file, simultaneously, both modes @1500 Hz AF overlapping: 2 x 100% decoding. 2.) Finally, with additional strong (overdriven) white noise, the winner becomes clear: MFSK16 continues to be 100% decoding, the pattern is still visible in the waterfall. OL-8-1K now with some errors in the text, at last. MFSK-16 + Olivia-8-1000 @ 1500 Hz Modes must be set manually, overlapping RSIDs not working: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dmtspk178vfagrx/2017-03-11_VOA206-MFSK16-OL8-1K-White_Noise.wav?dl=1 https://www.dropbox.com/s/kcns9cazmt86mid/2017-03-11_VOA206-MFSK16-OL8-1K-White_Noise.png?dl=1 (The MFSK-16 + OLIVIA-8-1000 audio comes from the System-D stream of WRMI) But, at another competition in the wave-editor: MFSK-16 against MFSK-16, same data, but a delay of 100ms: 50% decoding OL-8-1000 vs OL-8-1000, same data, again a delay of 100ms: 100% decoding !!! OLIVIA is thus the winner in the case of strong multipath. MFSK16 is better at weak one-way paths. roger roger
- Vorherige Nachricht (dieses Gesprächs): [A-DX] {dxld} VOA Radiogram, 11-12 Mar 2017
- Nächste Nachricht (dieses Gesprächs): [A-DX] Rum
- Nachrichten sortiert nach: [ Datum ] [ Thema ] [ Betreff (Subject)] [ Autor ]