[A-DX] Fw: [DXplorer] Actives-Inactives table
Wolfgang BueschelMo Okt 26 17:49:08 CET 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [A-DX] Log: 12125, IBRA, VN, 1614....UC, 26.10.15
- Next message (by thread): [A-DX] NDB at 930 kHz
- Nachrichten sortiert nach: [ Datum ] [ Thema ] [ Betreff (Subject) ] [ Autor ]
Ja, so ist es. wb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Kusalik > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [DXplorer] Actives-Inactives table Bruce, You couldn't have said it any better..especially your last statement....on how many stations view a reply... Edward Kusalik 'Bruce Churchill' [DXplorer] wrote: > > I would say that verifying anywhere near 100 countries these days > would be just about impossible without extraordinary (and expensive) > effort! I'm not sure even personal visits would do the job. 50 VIC > would be a significant accomplishment! About the only QSLs you hear > about in recent months are organizations that broker their programming > through a handful of high-powered transmitters. Apparently the whole > notion of verifying reports has declined precipitously along with the > number of SW broadcasters. I thought maybe e-QSLs would breathe some > life into the hobby, but this hasn't happened either. That's why I > record every station logged (and have done so since 2004) - not as > satisfying as receiving a nice card (or even an e-card) but in some > ways more of a pure verification of reception. Many stations have > previewed my recordings but never bothered to respond, even with a > simple "yeah, that was us" reply! > > Nice job on the list Jerry! A lot of work obviously went into this effort! > > Bruce
- Previous message (by thread): [A-DX] Log: 12125, IBRA, VN, 1614....UC, 26.10.15
- Next message (by thread): [A-DX] NDB at 930 kHz
- Nachrichten sortiert nach: [ Datum ] [ Thema ] [ Betreff (Subject)] [ Autor ]